Your Profit Hour
  • World News
  • Investing
  • Tech News
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

Skinner v. Louisiana Brief: Prosecutors Must Be Held Accountable for Withholding Exculpatory Evidence

by July 31, 2025
July 31, 2025

Matthew Cavedon and Laura Bondank

supreme court

Michael Wearry and James Skinner were convicted of the same murder more than twenty years ago. In 2016, the Supreme Court vacated Wearry’s conviction, finding that the prosecution’s failure to disclose material evidence in accordance with Brady v. Maryland violated Wearry’s due process rights. Following Wearry’s success, Skinner brought his own claim for postconviction relief, arguing that the Brady violations at issue in Wearry’s case likewise tainted his trial. But in a cursory two-page opinion, the Louisiana district court denied Skinner’s request and distinguished Wearry’s case without much explanation.

The rule established in Brady v. Maryland requires prosecutors to turn over exculpatory evidence prior to trial. Despite the Supreme Court’s clear instructions, Brady violations remain one of the most common and most serious types of prosecutorial misconduct. Recent studies reveal that prosecutors often intentionally violate Brady but almost never face consequences. This crisis of accountability for prosecutors, combined with institutional pressures to achieve high conviction rates, encourages noncompliance with Brady and results in wrongful convictions.

This problem is compounded by the dominance of plea bargaining, which has usurped the jury trial as the most common method of resolving criminal cases. Courts remain split on whether Brady applies to plea bargaining, and prosecutors often require pleading defendants to waive their right to challenge their convictions on appeal. If defendants lack confidence that any trial they receive will be fair, due to the government withholding exculpatory evidence, they will be even more likely to forgo trial and plead guilty.

Cato has filed an amicus brief asking the Supreme Court to grant Skinner’s petition, vacate his sentence, and remand for a new trial. Doing so would reaffirm that compliance with Brady is a constitutional imperative, not a discretionary practice, and reinforce the safeguards needed to guarantee due process.

previous post
Mother O’ Mercy! Is This the End of the Cal Bullet Train?
next post
Jefferson Davis von Hayek?

You may also like

No, Tariffs Are Not Similar to Consumption Taxes...

August 1, 2025

Friday Feature: Thales Academy

August 1, 2025

Are Stablecoins CBDCs in Disguise? No

August 1, 2025

A Good Start: Congress Cuts Funding for USAID...

July 31, 2025

Trump Punishes Brazilian Censor in Chief, But Tariffs...

July 31, 2025

Former Intel CEO Calls for a US Sovereign...

July 30, 2025

A Response to Misinformation Criticism

July 30, 2025

Election Policy Roundup

July 30, 2025

Why I Signed the Economists’ Amicus Brief Challenging...

July 30, 2025

Private School Survey: What’s Behind Seemingly Cooling Enrollment?

July 30, 2025

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

    Get the daily email that makes reading the news actually enjoyable. Stay informed and entertained, for free.

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

    Recent Posts

    • No, Tariffs Are Not Similar to Consumption Taxes Like a VAT

      August 1, 2025
    • Friday Feature: Thales Academy

      August 1, 2025
    • Why Governments Burned Money

      August 1, 2025
    • Why Governments Burned Money

      August 1, 2025
    • Are Stablecoins CBDCs in Disguise? No

      August 1, 2025
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 yourprofithour.com | All Rights Reserved

    Your Profit Hour
    • World News
    • Investing
    • Tech News
    • Stock
    • Editor’s Pick